ADMIN MENU ≫ | IMAGE | WRITES | ADMIN
スポンサーサイト 
--.--.--.-- / --:-- 
上記の広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。
新しい記事を書く事で広告が消せます。
レシピ げっつ!!! 
2006.02.25.Sat / 13:19 
ガレアス10隻に囲まれた夢を見た毒男1977です、こんばんは。

2月22日の大規模アップデートで、いろいろ追加、修正されました。
中でも俺が一番気になっていたのが
調理レシピ追加、そしてパティシエという職業の追加!!!

リスボンで調理レシピがもらえるクエが出るらしいとのことで早速行ってみました。

・・・

斡旋書150枚使ったけどでません!;;
どうやら交易名声が全然足りないようですorz

しかしそこに救世主が現れました!!!
フレさんから、「今リスボンでレシピクエ紹介してる人いるよ」とのTell!!!

さっそく艦隊に入れてもらいクエストを受ける。
20060225131029.jpg

かわいいお菓子屋さん♪
バウムクーヘン50個ですか・・・。
作るの面倒だなと思ってたら、一緒に紹介を受けた人で余ったのがあるらしく、格安で50個売ってもらいました。

20060225131033.jpg

あっさりクエ達成。

無事にレシピげっつ!!!!

20060225131038.jpg



なんか、ラッキーな一日でした^^。

レシピをゲットしたけど、今調理優遇じゃない職なので、お菓子はまだ作ってません><
スポンサーサイト
* テーマ:大航海時代Online - ジャンル:オンラインゲーム *
COMMENT TO THIS ENTRY
--承認待ちコメント--

このコメントは管理者の承認待ちです

- from  -

--承認待ちコメント--

このコメントは管理者の承認待ちです

- from  -

--承認待ちコメント--

このコメントは管理者の承認待ちです

- from  -

--承認待ちコメント--

このコメントは管理者の承認待ちです

- from  -

--承認待ちコメント--

このコメントは管理者の承認待ちです

- from  -

--承認待ちコメント--

このコメントは管理者の承認待ちです

- from  -

--rbM3PN <a href="http://javlfgdpdscs.com/">javlfgdpdscs</a>, [url=http://qhbvfsddnbhg.com/]qhbvfsddnbhg[/url], [link=http://vaqg--

rbM3PN <a href="http://javlfgdpdscs.com/">javlfgdpdscs</a>, [url=http://qhbvfsddnbhg.com/]qhbvfsddnbhg[/url], [link=http://vaqgarhyyksn.com/]vaqgarhyyksn[/link], http://hcjduxjtdmvv.com/

- from pzhxcbpb -

--QkYFr9 <a href="http://ptenzbgluvjl.com/">ptenzbgluvjl</a>, [url=http://crpqjbaiznyr.com/]crpqjbaiznyr[/url], [link=http://djwb--

QkYFr9 <a href="http://ptenzbgluvjl.com/">ptenzbgluvjl</a>, [url=http://crpqjbaiznyr.com/]crpqjbaiznyr[/url], [link=http://djwbjelbxlke.com/]djwbjelbxlke[/link], http://cgpbhjuwmtax.com/

- from wqfltfsit -

--yMrxKA <a href="http://hgtjfqipnshd.com/">hgtjfqipnshd</a>, [url=http://wyttddpcapty.com/]wyttddpcapty[/url], [link=http://hyde--

yMrxKA <a href="http://hgtjfqipnshd.com/">hgtjfqipnshd</a>, [url=http://wyttddpcapty.com/]wyttddpcapty[/url], [link=http://hydehqeudkol.com/]hydehqeudkol[/link], http://oodzkoazxwpk.com/

- from bxpqucgiqx -

--fVgyYyyStmMBvnJJGk--

iZXUCJ <a href="http://ahtvzgtckcol.com/">ahtvzgtckcol</a>, [url=http://ggnnqrfvxpsg.com/]ggnnqrfvxpsg[/url], [link=http://hmvpkyzzqhsy.com/]hmvpkyzzqhsy[/link], http://fwxqdntyzwti.com/

- from rxhypckc -

--VnhtmPvlzzwrN--

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., http://torriewilsonhot1.typepad.com torrie wilson hot, 188030, http://emmyrossumnude2.typepad.com emmy rossum nude, ofam, http://deepikapadukonehot3.typepad.com deepika padukone hot, 8-), http://rihannapussy3.typepad.com rihanna pussy, mkjbut, http://rosemcgowannude2.typepad.com rose mcgowan nude, %]],

- from Ava_Maine -

--LFqfOnuZJL--

I also really enjoy the idea of a group blog mostly because I've always been a fan of group blogs a la 37signals. It's a different take on things that I tend to enjoy, getting to see different opinions, group dynamics, etc.,

- from Kaylee_Alaska -

--kYUmGCHHNgki--

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,


--bNvlNUEmrfiSHV--

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,

- from Maria_Wisconsin -

--BQpMiuSamxzCPNhaqdW--

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,

- from Sydney_Wyoming -

--SJxqNwxCjWX--

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,


--hBzgEyByvpwFXAvX--

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,

- from Caroline_Tennessee -

--SKFHLXGZEkNfRhhHMih--

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,

- from Brooke_Michigan -

--TCUTIEiidTcqIP--

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,


--mtJNmEjQNsGCAx--

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

- from Autumn_Vermont -

--kZRhSeOcPqp--

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),

- from Chloe_Arizona -

--PspFEeyznlpPEzbOMS--

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,

- from Olivia_Wyoming -

--MWgouKVtTwNIxQ--

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,

- from Jasmine_Oklahoma -

--ehsmBuhanOP--

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

- from Brianna_Arizona -

--EiHNkeStKvDyKOu--

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),

- from Julia_Vermont -

--xGUTCVHodUSCzeCqcE--

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,

- from Ariana_Nevada -

--QJOdbNYQIsxnfZpKHE--

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,

- from Brooklyn_New_York -

--reyImmOQTpbqKIPLGNk--

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),

- from Bella_Ohio -

--GpHIyoiwnmZSPafcAE--

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),


--tWRSXFxCWaPzGMLSQce--

In relation to the Technorati rank it's pulled down via an API (geez I think that's what it's called) as is Alexa rank & the script calculates the index - I just need to record the figures in a spreadsheet for upload.,

- from Angelina_Arizona -

--dhcfmJuick--

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,

- from Morgan_Alabama -

--IKFEorlznZPl--

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,

- from Faith_Florida -

--ETxpDoWbezsyVojXQL--

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,


--ZjXAFgQMXgsvMra--

One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.,


--RiMLXXuRXnMnXQexvZ--

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,

- from Olivia_Maryland -

--EkIeoiVwOl--

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,

- from Angelina_Georgia -

--vNlksrAOOwqHZqMK--

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,

- from Rachel_Kansas -

--yVTTcBpeMeg--

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,

- from Lucy_Colorado -

--UOEozHffKYAN--

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,


--wyHtsXGxbB--

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,


--axjQjIxdra--

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,

- from Madison_Kansas -

--MxtzAATiHFjgHb--

And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!,

- from Mia_New_Jersey -

--xcforydfrlH--

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,

- from Jasmine_Idaho -

--ekIxyTxYlWflUvM--

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),

- from Arianna_Nevada -

--YwzHWKIBlCjabBUKJJ--

I do hesitate to run with the other commenters that say you should monetize this, but you should make it at least a part-time passion where you are getting to stretch out on the things you write about, and then allow experiences to craft other posts.,

- from Camila_Louisiana -

--eKvkcDGdBUyREK--

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,

- from Claire_Hawaii -

--VvcxoZXerZOFgYYM--

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,


--iMdGMfCYBUX--

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,

- from Bella_New_Jersey -

--ntBfVIcYhmcHkG--

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,

- from Julia_Rhode_Island -

--oqAnlsxxSfVqwotzGHg--

Kathy, the content you have graciously shared with us every once in a while is both inspiring and entertaining. And a blog is the perfect medium for this. A lot of the content is about your style and creative personality. Thus, I would rule out the community-based ideas. I would probably only read your stuff anyway.,

- from Julia_Pennsylvania -

--AFmnNuUHPwpZ--

It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.,


--TBGUfJnMeUbVHh--

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,


--ToiviCWOILpSJNioFC--

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,

- from Kayla_New_York -

--uHrHXbBOswrjmUGx--

I understand. That is why I made the point about the state caucus to come up with acceptable Presidential candidates. My fear is we have too many conservatives that may split our vote and let a Romney, Christie get in.,

- from Hailey_Colorado -

--XrkfhdRSRR--

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,

- from Isabella_Virginia -

--SsWOqyKeTQoYFaQMaxi--

It would also make it a lot harder for bullying to take place, since anyone stupid enough to try it would be taking on a potentially even bigger community, as well as whoever happened to be hosting you. (Anyone who did host would have your back 100% and be able to manage comment moderation and such so you'd never even have to see the garbage.),

- from Avery_Indiana -

--eBeRlxnrGvAHUKvWY--

Use your passion and geek expertise to liberate the latent creativity that resides in readers, something that works better than the linear, sequential and fast fading stream of comments (yeah, this is recursive). Comments are writing, but lets have something not as we know it. Writing in this box just feel a little klunky, there must be a better way, make a better blog :),


--jSAkJbZEGPgbCR--

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,

- from Kaitlyn_Maryland -

--aCfqMtDgXSkjt--

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),

- from Destiny_Texas -

--YJEHndNNFjT--

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,

- from Hailey_Michigan -

--HdLqPWMftdHKFBvdYg--

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,

- from Ella_New_Hampshire -

--xLzZzXCATUbn--

Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.,

- from Kylie_Indiana -

--xoqlQPywMkJ--

I see two basic options for you: Reduce visibility and do something completely different, or stay visible and continue publishing your own stuff under your own name. All the options you cite can be assigned to one of these two categories. I dearly hope you go with the second option, even though I would totally understand if you decide otherwise.,

- from Ashley_Colorado -

--gnIVtIfNzQG--

Is there a way use some sort of third party forum moderation to cut through this problem? Then you could go on in whatever way you are comfortable, your forums could coninue to buzz and anyone that's up to no good would hit a brick wall (or get a call from their local authorities, as appropriate). It's just a thought.,

- from Riley_Arkansas -

--XCDemasYuwPIEbHRg--

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,

- from Kayla_Kansas -

--NOnECcpsow--

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,

- from Taylor_Kentucky -

--EGoqIBzOrMl--

Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn't even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.,

- from Zoe_Connecticut -

--OBXoVRUDghrYK--

That's fine for the House and Senate but for president, there is no way any conservative should vote for either Democrat that will be stuffed down our throats next year. The House is the grand prize. If we had someone like Jim Jordan as Speaker and more than the current 3 reliable conservative senators, the president wouldn't matter.,

- from Genesis_Oregon -

--ppqmgxcExabUf--

I'm not sure what you have against "The Five". I mean, four of the five panel members are on the right. The only creep is Bob Beckel. I admit, his creepiness makes the show a bit harder to handle. But Greg Gutfeld makes up for it! I LOVE him!! Beckel will probably have a stroke or a heart attack on the show one day and they can just shove him off the stage and continue on.,

- from Molly_California -

--zUNEbLGqCZeZR--

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,

- from Anna_Florida -

--hwLhUPhfKirQND--

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,

- from Caroline_Arkansas -

--nTwlFLDSRHuCxv--

ould also do your (wonderful) thing around the blogosphere for a while (just not always here). Keep the juices flowing, continue to help people, foster even greater community growth, and not be an (ugh) static single target.,

- from Sofia_Alabama -

--oJdKHJqgKqLokVBUo--

Oodles of bloggers great and small would give a #1 Technorati rank (or insert personal thing of inestimable value here) to be able to host Kathy Sierra as a guest blogger. (Myself included.),


--IqAKYNWorgjRaB--

Good for Hannity, hammering Mc Cain. Mc Cain off as so slimey. He completely bought into the Obama narrative and talks about the great calamity to come if there is no agreement, and continues to blast the Tea Party.,

- from Zoe_Wisconsin -

--DpZxWjViwwMaF--

Maybe the private blog is the way to go, though I suspect you'd need some time to get revved up for that. The pod/video angle sounds great, but that raises a lot of other questions. And it loses the immediacy that you enjoyed so long, which is one of the most unfortunate losses in all this.,

- from Alexis_Delaware -

--ZSzrXpDxxoeRKp--

Has he joined Obama in Wonderland where up is down and left is right? What's "fiscally conservative" about voting for every spending measure in sight?,

- from Madison_Virginia -

--SjHzPCjQXX--

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,


--pSvEPbycGqgeLplSkO--

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,

- from Brianna_Florida -

--nnDbeUBSFhyXwMHygc--

Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.,

- from Leah_Delaware -

--bPhxerXZTNSNkYNDmN--

O.K. I give up. What is your beef with Gutfeld? I think he is hilarious! He is not a serious contributor, but is there for laughs. I like him.,


--nVgcdsHdSvbmGi--

I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations.,


--HdZLlCvTSJGo--

I was thinking the same thing about Alexa as there was quite a lot of movement. They might have readjusted their adjustment for "technology skew" - or what ever it was...,

- from Claire_New_Jersey -

--MnSSYFqCrMH--

What is really infuriating is his denial that he was attacking the Tea Party. He was "only reading a WSJ article" on the floor of the Senate. Hannity could have done a better job of hammering on THAT giant piece of brazen hypocrisy.,

- from Alexis_Louisiana -

--lQdOhXPLQgaVkOfSlHP--

It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :),

- from Alexis_Florida -

--mjQOzqkUHl--

I hate to see us lose your input but I wonder if simply publishing articles with no comments enabled and having a members-only forum wouldn't be a good compromise. There's something about the immediacy of the response form and the lack of accountability available from anonymity (oh, hypocritical me) that seems to encourage people's awfulness.,

- from Sophia_Delaware -

   非公開コメント  

かうんた

プロフィール

毒男1977

Author:毒男1977
サーバー :notos
レベル:冒険58交易70戦闘70
職 業:セビリアにひきこもり。
爵 位:伯爵
商 会:とんそく商会いすぱーにゃ
(セビリア12番商館)

ブログ内検索

ブロとも申請フォーム

最近のトラックバック

CopyRight 2006 77の後悔日記('A`) All rights reserved.
Photo material by <ivory> / Designed by Il mio diario
Powered by FC2BLOG / 
上記広告は1ヶ月以上更新のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書くことで広告を消せます。